111 Comments
Commenting has been turned off for this post

Great piece Stephen. Like with the PMO pressuring Raybould Wilson to influence the prosecution of SNC Lav, it’s important that regular people understand just how bad this is.

Expand full comment

From a friend who works closely with police forces and from another that knows several retired senior RCMP officers, Lucki has not been well viewed internally since her appointment over others viewed more capable and experienced. This incident has likely blown what remaining trust her internal audience might have had.

Also to note, I believe it was stated that part of the reason for the confusion in communications was attributed to Lucki and perhaps the PMO inserting themselves into the communications.

Expand full comment

Ms. Lucki lost my confidence during the SNC-Lavalin affair.

Expand full comment

Is there room on the ballot to get rid of all 3? Tomorrow? This government has rapidly deteriorated to "Beyond reality". Jagmeet needs to pull his support, and this insane charade needs to end.

Expand full comment

Obviously there are a lot of details missing but it seems reasonable to assume that Campbell's notes were reasonably accurate. At the same time, there is ample evidence from other files that Canada has lost its ability to get big things right and this like another example.

Expand full comment

I agree with the premise of your piece with respect to Lucki's accountability. It doesn't surprise me that she wanted to make the Libs happy, and she needs to take responsibility for that. But I don't support your premise that the rank and file RCMP officers involved in that debacle deserve our sympathy. If you have been following the evidence in this inquiry at all you have to reach the conclusion that they were incompetent from top to bottom. It is embarrassing that this is our national police force. From cowardice exhibited at the time (the officer who passed the killer on the road but waited to turn around and go after him because he was afraid - by the time he did turn around to do his job the killer had pulled off the road) to the fact that these witnesses refuse to be cross-examined by counsel for the families. It is unbelievable. These folks didn't sign up to be librarians, they signed up to be police - with all the attendant danger and responsibility to account that the job entails.

Expand full comment

The major players in Government better be careful. This scandal in the making has preliminary signs of a very important person in the RCMP speaking with confidence that meddling from the PMO politicized a criminal investigation.

There will be nowhere to run and hide from that.

Expand full comment

Maybe the RCMP shouldn't be involved in local policing and provincial police forces are needed across the country? As ridiculous as it sounds. the RCMP seems to hopelessly conflicted between acheiving the political goals of the federal government and doing actual police work.

Expand full comment

thanks for writing this. It needs to be said, and aired across all public airwaves.

Expand full comment

Lots of chaff here, but thank you Stephen Maher for this article, and your accurate recall of Supt. Campbell's demonstrated competence and communication skills. The knives may be out for him, but bear in mind that his sworn duty was to preserve the integrity of the multiple murder investigations underway at that time.

Expand full comment

Canadian Conservatives have long felt that a lot of the federal bureaucratic leadership tended to overly identify with Liberal positions. There felt like there was something to that, although heavily tempered by partisan self-pity and aversion to criticism. Since Trudeau was elected in 2015, though, it feels like those Conservative grumblings have been validated in an almost cartoonish fashion. There was the spectacle of civil servants cheering for and mobbing Justin Trudeau after his election in 2015, and booing critical questions to him from reporters. Michael Wernick running defense for the Liberals during the SNC-Lavalin scandal. Now the RCMP commissioner trying to influence an investigation to support the political goals of the governing party. This is only going to get worse if the next government is a vindictive Conservative government intent on settling scores. We need a functioning, non-partisan, professional civil service for this country to work.

Expand full comment

I have had ZERO confidence in any of these clowns since the first day they appeared on the scene. This calls for torches and pitchforks, now that all our guns are banned. The corruption, malfeasance and incompetence is off the scale.

Expand full comment
Jun 22, 2022·edited Jun 22, 2022

The Commissioner is appointed by the PM and reports to the Minister of Public Safety as the equivalent of an ADM. No Commissioner is truly independent of government and until this changes that person will always be subject to political interference and direction.

Have a look at the present Commissioner's mandate letter (?) from Mendecino https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/commissioners-mandate-letter. She's being micromanaged.

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022

I can't imagine the RCMP investigating itself and the Trudeau Government. The same reason they never investigated Trudeau's interference in our rule of law over the SNC Lavalin Affair. They are all in bed together. From the the RCMP, Trudeau and the PMO's staff, our judicial system, Health Care and Hospitals, Banks, to the Universities and Education system, who indoctrinated and continue to indoctrinate the youth. The entire system has been corrupted by these pathetic elites who look down on the working class and deem them unworthy of any form of entitlement. Their aim is to destroy any descent and the best way to ensure they survive the horror they are just beginning to inflict on humanity, they need the citisens unarmed and will do anything and everything to ensure they are. Hense the gun bans, internet survalence to crush any decenting views, mandates to gather and hand out Identity numbers to each Canadian. They want facial recognition on passports "for your safety", when it is strickly going to be used for theirs. They want you unarmed and controlled, so they can live the good life and do as they feel while they dictate to the peons. The sadest part of this is that many Canadians are blinded by the misinformation and disinformation that flows at a steady rate from the paid for Corporate news also backed by these power hungry, greedy, pigs at the taxpayers trough. The NDP prop these elites up in hopes they will be part of the chosen ones to rule over the rest. They are the enablers of all that is wrong in this country and they too need to be held accountable. We know that no one ever will be held accountable, no matter what these sick, power hungry, psychophants ever do. Wake up Canada your being turned into a penal colony under the rule of the globalist elites.

Expand full comment

It is somewhat hard to fathom that a writer can include the following two statements in the same article without any explanation as to how they relate:

“should be able to trust the Mounties to release information when and how it is in the public interest”

and

“the RCMP did a terrible job communicating with the public about the shooting, holding back information for no good reason, in keeping with its long tradition of failing to properly explain itself.”

Expand full comment
(Banned)Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022

I had to keep closing my jaw so it could drop again:

1) What WAS the reason for even thinking that keeping even more information from the public - at that time of all times, when not-informing-the-public had cost over a dozen lives - would HELP an investigation? What's the reasoning? "Oh, if they know we're looking for a guy who sold a Webley .58, they'll go to ground?" Nonsense. They keep information by this rule: "Do we HAVE to let it out? Then why not keep it secret?" Overclassification by reflex.

2) There's NOTHING wrong, and much right, and it's very normal, for hired experts on a subject of public safety (the doctors with medicine, cops with guns) to have a position on that public safety issue. It becoming "political" does not reduce the right and responsibility of the public servant to have a position on it. Masks (incredibly) becoming a "political" issue did not reduce Theresa Tam's job of promoting them. Police associations and police departments, speaking officially, take public positions on gun control, normally. Like the police chief of the Phoenix police department, speaking, in uniform, to the Senate Judiciary Committee just the other day.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/16/politics/police-organizations-gun-control/index.html

So, the very weak, or nonexistent argument for keeping even more information from the public, comes up against the clear responsibility of the police to follow Phoenix and dozens of other police departments and organizations like the National Organization of Police Chiefs, (below) in prioritizing public safety via gun control.

https://www.policemag.com/351091/police-chiefs-blast-senate-gun-vote-as-a-disgrace

3) This wasn't even taking a opinion position on the subject like those cops above; it was simply releasing a FACT, part of their job.

The rest of it, the "reduced to tears", and so forth, simply disgusts me. They were in a "waking nightmare" because of their own incompetent failure and secretiveness, their contempt for the public ability to handle bad news. (Authoritarian mentalities always think there will be 'panic in the streets'. Myth.) Best move for them and us was to resign in disgrace two years ago, (after all, they bully harassment complainants into leaving) and get on with a career they can handle; perhaps shoe sales, or hotel management.

Expand full comment